The Israel Deception

Is the return of Israel in the 20th century truly a work of God, or is it a result of a cosmic chess move to deceive the elect by the adversary?

Showing posts with label lawsuit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lawsuit. Show all posts

Sunday, February 5, 2017

Deutsche Bank apologizes to public in newspaper ad for rigging gold prices... now where is J.P. Morgan's apology?

2016 was the year that institutions such as Wells Fargo and Deutsche Bank lost a great deal of credibility over fraud that they conducted against customers, investors, and the overall markets.  And while Wells Fargo did their best to lie even to Congress about their creating millions of fraudulent accounts and credit cards without their customers knowledge, Deutsche Bank came clean and are now even offering an apology to investors in a national newspaper.
Deutsche Bank took out full-page ads in Germany's Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Sueddeutsche Zeitung on Saturday, in which the country's biggest lender apologized for (getting caught) engaging in market manipulation and misconduct that has cost the company billions. In the ad, signed by CEO John Cryan on behalf of the bank's top management,the bank said its past conduct "not only cost us money, but also our reputation and trust." - Zerohedge

Yet even with all this, the markets have yet to hear from perhaps the greatest gold and silver manipulator of all.  And this despite the fact that a higher court earlier this week overturned a lower court ruling that had dismissed lawsuits against J.P. Morgan for their rigging of prices in the precious metal markets.

Image result for jp morgan gold rigging
Appeals Court Overturns Dismissal in JP Morgan Silver Rigging Case 
  • US Appeals Court overturns Dismissal in Silver Rigging Case against JPMorgan
  • The Appeals court rejected Judge Engelmeyer’s claim that the plaintiffs did not prove JPMorgan made “uneconomic bids” in the silver forward’s markets.
  • New Discovery May Win the Case for against JPMorgan
Summary 
The New York 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled yesterday that District Court Judge Engelmayer was in error when he dismissed the Silver price rigging lawsuits against JP Morgan. The appellate court felt that Engelmayer’s dismissal reasons amounted to “impermissible fact finding” and placed too high of a bar in concluding that plaintiffs had not adequately plead their case. 
This reversal of the June, 2016 dismissal means the case will go back to the district court for further litigation. This also means the plaintiffs will ask for and receive more discovery. This can win the case for them. - Market Slant

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Silver price could recover faster than gold in 2017 as metal producers prepare to enter class action lawsuit against the banks

In the wake of the Deutsche Bank revelations that the bullion banks had been colluding to rig the gold and silver markets for at least the past decade, a group of metal producers, particularly those in the silver industry, are preparing to join a massive class action lawsuit against these banks for earnings and profits lost due to the manipulation of the metal's price.

Keith Neumeyer, who is the CEO of the world's largest silver producer, spoke in an interview on Jan. 3 where he stated that he is currently talking with the heads of several mining companies that may ban together at some point in the future to jump in on an ongoing class action lawsuit that is expected to incur damages well into the tens of billions of dollars. 
Now that the cat is out of the bag and Deutsche Bank has agreed to turn over documents implicating other banks in related schemes, major mining companies are preparing lawsuits of their own. Straight-shooting First Majestic Silver CEO Keith Neumeyer, who in 2015 was the first mining company head to issue a public statement on the manipulation of precious metals prices by a small concentration of players, has said that the company’s legal team is closely monitoring the situation
Citing loss of revenue, jobs and shareholder value Neumeyer said in an interview with SGT Report that his company will likely be preparing legal action against the bullion banks involved in the rigging of prices. - SHTF Plan
In addition to this, and on a separate note of interest, many precious metal analysts have been citing the greater potential for silver to rise in value much faster than gold in the future, especially as governments begin to crack down on gold ownership in the wake of collapsing currencies and monetary policies.  And with the expectation of silver being the catalyst for new technologies expected to arrive over the next five to ten years, once silver completely breaks away from its manipulation, the rebound back to a historic 15:1 or 10:1 ratio to gold will make it potentially one of the best investments of all time.

Thursday, October 6, 2016

Federal judge rules in favor of a lawsuit against the LBMA and bullion banks for fraud and manipulation in gold and silver prices

Ever since the 2008 financial crisis, most regulators for all markets have worked with, rather than against the banks that have been found guilty of committing dozens of crimes in the financial system.  From the rigging of currency and Libor rates, money laundering to drug cartels and terrorist organizations, mortgage fraud, and even the most recent instance of millions of cases of identity theft, no one is ever charged with the crimes individuals in these banks commit, and at best are simply fined a small amount compared to the profits they garnered from their fraud.

But on Oct. 3 an interesting ruling came down from a Federal judge for the Southern district of New York where the court ruled in favor of investors that a civil case against central and bullion banks could go forward due to strong evidence of fraud and manipulation in the rigging of gold and silver prices.

MarketSlant has obtained documents regarding the London Gold Fix Scandal currently being litigated in the New York Southern District Court.
They include the Judge's initial findings in the class action suit pitting the LBMA and its member Banks vs. Entities and Individuals that trade Gold and allege they were victims of price manipulation and suppression from January 1, 2004 to June 30, 2013.
In the document dated Oct 3, 2016, presiding Judge Valerie Caproni of the US District Court, Southern District rendered her Opinion and Order in the matter. Judge Caproni has validated that much of the claims have been substantiated and therefore is recommending litigation for many of the claims brought. - Market Slant

Thursday, June 16, 2016

Libya sues Goldman Sachs for using hookers as bribes to mislead the sovereign fund in 2008

Bankers involved with hookers, drugs, and bribes?  Nah, that would never happen.. but the sovereign investment fund for Libya’s national government begs to differ as they announced on June 14 that it indeed happened, and they are taking the Goldman Sachs to court for using these types of bribes to secure risky contracts that were lost during the fallout of the 2008 Credit Crash.
Libya’s national investment fund is seeking restitution for $1.2 billion it says was lost through investments made by Goldman Sachs, who put the money in toxic and risky investments which completely deteriorated when the global financial system collapsed eight years ago.
Hang-a-Banker
Read more on this article here...

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Canadian investors file a class action lawsuit against the London Gold fix banks for manipulation

Libor, Forex, money laundering for cartels, equities… what do all these have in common?  They are markets that banks and brokers were allowed to manipulate until it became public knowledge that fraud and corruption were taking place.
And with everyone and their brother knowing that gold markets and prices have been manipulated for decades, a new class action lawsuit filed by two Canadian investors through three Canadian law firms is trying to blow the whistle on one of the most egregious scams going on in the gold markets today.
In a suit filed on Dec. 22 against several banks involved in the London Gold Fix, lawyers from three firms are seeking $1.1 billion in restitution for losses taken by the manipulation of gold contracts and markets.

Read more on this article here...

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

While Congress waffles, 17 states decide to go to court over Obama’s immigration order

Despite the complete turnover in both Houses of Congress since 2010, the Republican led leadership has become little more than a limp dishrag when it comes to challenging the Constitutionality and legality of Barack Obama’s immigration programs.  But in a move that shows that many states have become extremely fed up with the political shenanigans in Washington, 17 of them signed on for a joint lawsuit condemning Obama’s most recent Executive Proclamation allowing for mass amnesty, and are seeking to have it overturned in the Supreme Court.


Read more on this article here...

Monday, December 1, 2014

Goldman Sachs joins three other major in banks in lawsuit tied to metals manipulation

The price rigging and manipulations just keep on coming in the Western financial system as a new lawsuit filed against Goldman Sachs, HSBC, and two other major banks accusing the institutions of wide-spread price fixing in Platinum and Palladium over a sever year period has been filed in Federal court this week.
 
The lawsuit filed in a court in Manhattan was done by Modern Settings LLC, a Florida-based maker of jewelry and police badges, and brings a to a judge a case where losses incurred to both businesses and customers equates to millions of dollars in over-pricing tied directly to commodity broker manipulation.
 
 
Read more on this article here...

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Capital One: Your friend in the debt collection business

It appears that the banking cartels care not for the rule of law, or even the basic decency of ensuring the people they harrass over outstanding debt are viable by law to be collected upon.  In a growing lawsuit by many former customers on Capital One, it appears that the credit card company was trying to get people to pay for charges that were already cleared up in bankruptcies.

Filing and completing bankruptcy proceedings is supposed to free consumers from paying any outstanding debt to credit card companies. But that hasn’t stopped Capital One, one of the leading credit card lenders, from going after bankrupt Americans.
More than 15,000 times, Capital One has taken individuals who have gone bankrupt to court in an effort to squeeze more money out of them. To do so knowingly is against the law. The company claims it just made a mistake…several thousand times.
Of the 15,500 people subjected to Capital One lawsuits, more than 800 of them have filed counter-suits to stop the company.
One bankruptcy judge, David Houston III in Aberdeen, Mississippi, plans to demand that representatives of Capital One appear before him in his court to explain its debt-collection practices. The judge previously rejected the company’s request to throw out a lawsuit that alleged Capital One sought $43,396.59 that was legally erased in an earlier bankruptcy case filed by the same person.
“I want some proof from the company that this was a legitimate error and not a conscious, malevolent effort to go out and collect a debt that’s been discharged,” Houston told The Wall Street Journal.
According to the Journal, “In 2008, a U.S. bankruptcy trustee in Massachusetts accused Capital One of illegally trying 5,600 times to collect debts already wiped out by a bankruptcy judge.” That same year, Capital One was itself saved from potential bankruptcy when it received a $3.55 billion bailout from U.S. taxpayers as part of the Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program.
The founder, chairman and chief executive officer of Capital One is the ironically named Richard Fairbank. - All Gov.com

As we know from 2008... what are laws and rules for the little people when it comes to banks and their own insatiable appetite to consume the wealth of everyone like an economic black hole.

Friday, December 16, 2011

Three years too late: Sec to finally sue Fannie and Freddie executives for fraud

During the Savings and Loan scandal of two plus decades ago, over 1100 bankers were arrested, indicted, and jailed for fraud.  In the 2008 credit crisis and subprime meltdown, nary a soul has been interrogated beyond a cursory hearing before the Congressional dog and pony shows.

So when the SEC in 2011 finally decides to step up and act like they are doing their fudiciary and regulatory duty in suing former CEO's of Fannie and Freddie for fraud and misleading investors on the subprime risk, it is simply a matter of three years too late, and one wonders if this is a simply a political move, rather than a judicial one.

Between December 6, 2006, and August 8, 2008, (the "Relevant Period"), Daniel H. Mudd ("Mudd"), Enrico Dallavecchia ("Dallavecchia") and Thomas A. Lund ("Lund") (collectively, "Defendants"), made or substantially assisted others in making materially false and misleading statements regarding Fannie Mae's exposure to subprime and Alt-A loans.
For example, in a February 2007 public filing, Fannie Mae described subprime loans as loans "made to borrowers with weaker credit histories" and reported that 0.2%, or approximately $4.8 billion, of its Single Family credit book of business as of December 31, 2006, consisted of subprime mortgage loans or structured Fannie Mae Mortgage Backed Securities ("MBS") backed by subprime mortgage loans.
Fannie Mae did not disclose to investors that in calculating the Company's reported exposure to subprime loans, Fannie Mae did not include loan products specifically targeted by the Company towards borrowers with weaker credit histories, including Expanded Approval ("EA") loans. As ofDecember 31, 2006, the amount ofEA loans owned or securitized in the Company's single-family credit business was approximately $43.3 billion, yet none of these loans were included in the Company's disclosed subprime exposure. - Lawsuit filed

Mudd Fnm Fre Doc

Monday, December 12, 2011

The absolute reason why liberalism and Occupy Wall Street is a mental disorder

There comes a time in history when a society must relegate their mentally ill to institutions so that they cannot destroy the entire culture for the sake of a few.  Of course, when those few become many, sometimes one will actually grow up to teach others, and grow it like a disease.

Michael Savage coined the phrase that liberalism is a mental disorder.  Now we can add the Occupy Wall Street crew to that stereotype.  A colleague was speaking to a friend of his who had attended Occupy gatherings, and told him this statement with a straight face.

"There is no good reason, why the Federal Government can't pass a law making it a crime for investments to lose money. That in this day an age, we should be past all of this ups and downs, that we can regulate the markets to where his money makes more, or else."

This is the epitome of a large portion of the nation, who call themselves the 99ers, and belong instead on the short bus, and outside any sembalence of society.

Monday, December 5, 2011

MF Global lawsuit bypasses company and goes straight to Jon Corzine

Since the CFTC, Attorney General, Obama administration, and every regulator refuses to touch Jon Corzine after the MF Global theft and scandal rocked the commodities world, two former employees have bypassed a lawsuit agains the company and went straight for the man himself on failed fudiciary responsibility.

And as of today, two former employees have proceeded to sue Jon Corzine as fins.com reports. "Two former employees of MF Global have filed a class-action lawsuit against the firm's former Chief Executive Jon Corzine, other senior executives and board directors on behalf of themselves and current and former employees who acquired stock in the company while Corzine led the firm. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that the defendants provided false information regarding the company's financial condition and made statements that artificially inflated the stock price." Jon Corzine and the board breached their fiduciary duty to their employees and destroyed their careers and retirement savings," Jacob Zamansky, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in an email. - Zerohedge

The debate between Bernie Madoff and Jon Corzine comes down to who is protected by the powers that be and who isn't.  Bernie had the hammer brought down on him, while Corzine to this point has been touched with kid gloves.  However, for employees who lost everything because of the massive fraud implemented by the former CEO, they could care less about his political connections and appear to want to make him pay in civil court, which is outside the jurisdiction of his friends Biden and Obama.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Ticketmaster settlement: Everyone who bought tickets could receive a rebate

After several years of litigation, a settlement against Ticketmaster for imposing surcharges on customers without their knowledge has finally been ruled upon.  Beginning next year, everyone who bought a ticket through their online or retail stores could receive accumulated credits towards ticket purchases.

Because of a proposed class action settlement, Ticketmaster is being forced to credit $1.50 per ticket order (up to 17 orders) to customers due to the fact that they profited off of "processing fees" without declaring as much.
And despite the reparations, Ticketmaster can continue to profit off transactions — they just have to say they're doing so on their website. - Yahoo Finance

A boon for concert goers indeed, but the question remains... who kept their receipts going back a decade or more?

Monday, October 10, 2011

Women sues city of Houston for being forced to listen to Rush Limbaugh

A women in Houston, Texas has filed a lawsuit against the muncipality for what she considers being 'forced' to listen to Rush Limbaugh in her office.

Bridgett Nicholson Boyd filed a lawsuit against the city of Houston for being forced to listen to Limbaugh's radio show. In 2010, Boyd was ticketed for driving on the shoulder of a road (even though she said her car was breaking down). The police officer also arrested her and drove her to the local jail. During the ride, Boyd said, she was forced to listen to Limbaugh make "derogatory comments about black people" (which the officer was laughing at). Though the charges against Boyd were immediately dropped, she's now claiming defamation, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. - Yahoo news
Alas, I wonder if the police officers can sue black criminals in the future for hearing rap lyrics being played that call for cop killing, and violent disobedience.
Once again, the anti-Spock reality of political correctness has swung its axe.  The feelings of one, outweigh the rights of everyone else.