The Israel Deception

Is the return of Israel in the 20th century truly a work of God, or is it a result of a cosmic chess move to deceive the elect by the adversary?

Showing posts with label congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label congress. Show all posts

Saturday, April 29, 2017

With Congress unwilling to provide tax relief to Americans, join the new tax revolt whenever you dine out

There used to be just two primary things that were true in life... those being death and taxes.  But ever since the start of the new millennia, we can add a third one to that list, and it is the incompetency of government to ever do anything that is beneficial for the American people.

Case in point.  Ever since President George Herbert Walker Bush lied to the the people and said, 'read my lips, no new taxes', every single President since has at some point increased the burden of the American people to provide more and more money to feed the monster that is Washington.

Fast forward to 2017 and President Donald Trump's tax cut proposal.

Using the Reagan model of 'trickle down' economics, Donald Trump is seeking to pass a massive tax cut for corporations, small businesses, and in a minor sort of way, for the Middle Class.  However there has been no real efforts made by Congress in the first 100 days of Trump's Presidency to actually write legislation to accomplish this, and it is unlikely to occur since the House and Senate are unwilling to accept a decline in their own revenue largesse even as the American people find themselves completely tapped out in credit and savings.

Ironically, it took less than this for the colonists to rebel against Britain when they passed the Stamp Act and demanded the colonists use only their fiat currency to conduct commerce back in 1776.  And with some Americans paying upwards of 60% of their income to Federal and State governments (California), the ballot box no longer provides a means of redress.

Thus it's time to use a little ingenuity and begin a legalized form of tax revolt.

In a recent event from the state of Missouri last week, a customer dining out at a restaurant decided to 'stick it to the government' and crossed out their expected 'tip' for the servers who provided him his meal, and instead wrote on a piece of paper that the money that would have formerly gone for a tip be given instead to the server as a gift.


Now why is this significant?  Because tips are taxed by the government as wages, while gifts are not taxable if they do not exceed a certain monetary threshold.
  • You can give up to $14,000 to any number of individuals this year without triggering gift taxes.
  • Anything above the annual limit has to be reported and counts toward your lifetime exclusion.
In addition, this is also a way to respond to the growing demand for a boost in the minimum wage without needing a law to accomplish this, and to also help keep lower income workers receiving welfare benefits for those who need it.

The rich have always skated by not having to pay their full share of taxes by simply incorporating themselves where they have hardly any income, and where most of the money they receive is taxed under the umbrella of much lower capital gains rules.  In addition, these elite can deduct almost anything which lowers their taxable earnings even more.  And if both the state and Federal governments simply see the American people as entities solely existing to provide them money so they can take us into unnecessary wars or fund wasteful social and green agendas, then the only way to fight back is to find our own loopholes in the tax code... starting with the elimination of tips and instead replacing them with gifts.

Friday, April 14, 2017

As consumers find themselves broke, a proposal to Congress would sacrifice social security for more money to spend

When 9/11 hit, the Bush administration saw that the terror event could have serious ramifications on the economy as people naturally would pull back on spending out of fear of further geo-political and domestic crises.  And in the wake of this the President not only went on the air encouraging people to spend using the guise of 'Don't let the terrorists win', but he also got Congress to approve a tax rebate to filter billions of dollars into consumer's pockets so they would prime the pump to keep spending.

Then following the 2008 Financial Crisis and subsequent Great Recession, that decade of spending that was additionally fueled by near zero interest rates and a housing bubble which gave homeowners a virtual 'equity checkbook' came to an abrupt halt as job losses, foreclosures, and the realization of massive consumer debt put the economy into its worst environment since the Great Depression.

So the Fed then embarked on a new program called Quantitative Easing where they pumped $10's of trillions of dollars onto Wall Street and the Federal Government to facilitate the creation of not just one asset bubble, but multiple ones in housing, stocks, student loans, automobile loans, and the bond market.  And this provided the illusion of recovery, but only sustainable as long as the increased printing of money did not reach the point of diminishing returns.

But alas, that happened during 2015 where it takes at least $4 new printed dollars to equal $1 new dollar in GDP growth.

As we reach the end of the first quarter of 2017, the data is signalling the tipping point of all of these bubbles, and an end to consumers being able to borrow and spend beyond their means.  Retailers are closing stores and filing for bankruptcies at accelerating rates, and earlier this month credit card debt for Americans crossed over $1 trillion for the first time since prior to the 2008 crash.

So with consumer and government spending making up 80-85% of the nation's GDP, what is left for Congress and/or the Fed to scheme up to keep the economy from 'officially' spinning back towards an ever greater recession than nine years ago?

One proposal suggested by a Congressional lobbyist to legislators would be to cut or eliminate the Social Security tax paid by workers and business owners in favor of getting that money into the pockets of consumers so they can keep the ponzi scheme going for a few more years.

Image result for fed bush economy titanic
President Trump and his Republican colleagues are in a precarious position at the moment. They need to find ways to trim costs, yet not at the expensive of expanding the federal deficit. One idea being floated around Washington by a GOP lobbyist, according to Fox News, is one that would see the payroll tax drastically cut or eliminated entirely. 
In 2015, Social Security generated $920.2 billion in revenue, and the payroll tax accounted for 86.4% of that revenue. The payroll tax, which also funds Medicare, is a 15.3% aggregate tax on earned income. Overall, 12.4% goes to fund Social Security, and 2.9% funds Medicare. However, most workers are only responsible for half of this amount, with their employers covering the remainder. Thus, your responsibility as a worker is often 7.65% of your earned income (6.2% to Social Security and 1.45% to Medicare). Only the self-employed wind up paying the full 15.3%. 
Even then, Social Security's payroll tax has added exemptions. Earned income is taxed between $0.01 and $127,200, as of 2017. Any additional income above and beyond $127,200 is free and clear of taxation, which is a big benefit to the wealthy.
Under the Republican proposal, the payroll tax for Social Security (the aforementioned 12.4% tax) would be eliminated, while the Medicare tax of 2.9% would remain in place. 
Why eliminate this absolutely critical source of funding? Removing the Social Security payroll tax would add $3,100 to the pockets of the average Americans household earning $50,000 a year. Republican lawmakers have long believed that putting money back into the pockets of Americans is the best way to stimulate our consumption-driven economy. - Madison
With the government already borrowing over $1 trillion in deficit spending each year to simply make ends meet, the concept of borrowing the additional difference to cover Social Security payments should the tax be cut or removed from workers is not only in of the realm of possibiities, but has already been done back in the 1990's when President Bill Clinton replaced the $3 trillion cash surplus that was in the Social Security trust fund with U.S. Treasuries (debt) so they could spend the money elsewhere on the way to building the first great bubble, that of the Dot Com variety.

Sunday, March 26, 2017

Gold and silver climb on Sunday open as dollar within 70 bps of critical 200 day moving average

As markets opened for Asian trading on Sunday evening in the Western time zones, the dollar continued its slide downward following the House's failure to bring about a healthcare vote to the floor.  And with gold moving up nearly $10 in the first couple hours of global trading, it may only be a matter of days or even hours before the dollar falls below, and gold crosses above, their 200 day moving averages.

On Friday the dollar index showed a close for the USD of 99.77, and had already dropped below its 50 and 100 day moving averages earlier in the week.  And with Congress appearing to be in a stalemate following the healthcare vote debacle, the markets are not trusting in the legislature to be able to deal with upcoming debt ceiling discussion that is currently ticking down for the government.


Gold and silver on the other hand are both becoming beneficiaries of the dollars free fall, and the Fed's inability to deal with economies ongoing stagflation.


Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard submits bill to decriminalize pot and remove it from the Fed's drug schedule

On March 21, Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard submitted a bi-partisan bill to Congress calling for the decriminalization of marijuana, and having it removed from the Federal government's drug list as a schedule 1 substance.

Titled HR1227, the Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act, this bill is also being co-sponsored by Republican Congressman Tom Garrett from Virginia.

Image result for pot benefits
Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard has urged Congress to federally decriminalize marijuana Tuesday, introducing a bipartisan act to to remove the drug from the federal controlled substances list. 
“FBI reports have shown that in 2011 alone, an individual in the United States was arrested for marijuana use, sale or possession every 42 seconds,” Gabbard said in a statement. 
The congresswoman introduced the Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act (HR. 1227) with Republican Virginia Rep. Tom Garrett, calling on Congress to update its “outdated drug policies”. 
The pair called on Congress to take into account the growing body of evidence that suggests the medicinal benefits of marijuana, from the treatment of epileptic seizures to reducing anxiety and “even halting the growth of cancer cells.” 
The FDA currently classifies marijuana as a Schedule 1 classification, along with MDMA and heroin. - Russia Today
The demonization of marijuana goes back nearly 100 years to around the time of alcohol prohibition and the aftermath of the 1910 Mexican Revolution where streams of Mexican immigrants came into the United States bringing with them their cultural use of cannabis.  And like the demonization of Opium decades before when it was brought to the U.S. by Chinese immigrants during the construction of the railroads, the basis for pot's prohibition was primarily racial, and later political when psuedo-scientists and quack physicians paid by the government began PR campaigns to falsely equate the drug with crime, rape, and the actions of undesired immigrants.

Thursday, February 2, 2017

With Donald Trump now in Office, Congress finally gets the courage to put the fear of God into the Fed, and Chairman Yellen

There is an interesting dichotomy that is now occurring since the Republican Party took over control of both houses of Congress, and the office of the President... and that is a new focus on the Federal Reserve and the illegal activities they have been allowed to conduct for eight years under Barack Obama.

Image result for hang central bankers

A number of years ago when Ben Bernanke was still the Chairman of the Fed, Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer gave the central bank carte blanche to do anything they saw fit to try to fix the economy.  And this distribution of both monetary and fiscal policies that were the responsibility of the Congress assured that the Fed would never have any real oversight to do as they saw fit... including the re-distribution of the wealth of the Middle Class into the hands of the 1%.

Image result for chuck schumer banks lobby
It appears that Democrats may be taking a more aggressive stand in urging the Fed to do more easing. 
After 5-minute discussion of the economy, and the ongoing disappointing recovery, Chuck Schumer ended his query of Ben Bernanke at the Senate today with this memorable exchange. 
His conclusion: “Get to work, Mr. Chairman.” — CNBC
But this has all changed now that Donald Trump has taken over the White House, and it appears his willingness to call out the Fed, Chairman Yellen, and even Vice-Chairman Stanley Fischer is leading other Republicans to man up and publicly put the central bank on notice that their days of non-transparent oversight may be over.
In what may be a harbinger of major headaches to come for the Fed, a recent letter (Jan. 31) penned by Republican representative  Patrick McHenry, Vice Chairman of the Financial Services Committee, has lashed out at Janet Yellen, telling the Fed chair in no uncertain terms that "despite the clear message delivered by President Donald Trump in prioritizing America's interest in international negotiations, it appears that the Federal Reserve continues negotiating international regulatory standards for financial institutions among global bureaucrats in foreign lands without transparency, accountability, or the authority to do so." 
His assessment of this ongoing activity by the Fed: "This is unacceptable."
McHenry's emphasis is on "international forums" such as the Financial Stability Board, the Basel Committee on Banking and Supervision, and the International Association of Insurance Supervisors, and he notes that "continued participation" in these forums must be "predicated on achieving objectives set by the new Administration", something which will "likely require a comprehensive review of past agreements that unfairly penalized the American financial system in areas as varied as bank capital, insurance, derivatives, systemic risk, and asset management." 
He then adds that "the secretive structures of these international forums must also be reevaluated" because when the deals were negotiated, "international standards were turned into domestic regulations that forced American firms of various sizes to substantially raise their capital requirements, leading to slower economic growth here in America." 
Here one may recall how the Fed secretly provided tens of billions in under the table "rescue loans" to foreign banks doing business in the US (and others) during the peak days of the 2008 financial crisis. 
His conclusion, however, is what must worry the Fed the most, because  as McHenry notes, "it is incumbent upon all regulators to support the U.S. economy, and scrutinize international agreements that are killing American jobs. Accordingly, the Federal Reserve must cease all attempts to negotiate binding standards burdening American business until President Trump has had an opportunity to nominate and appoint officials that prioritize America's best interests." 
The implication: the current Fed officials do not prioritze America's best interests, and are therefore expendable. - Zerohedge
As the MAGA movement begins to invade all aspects of the government and society, those who are now on board the Trump Train to try to Make America Great Again are realizing that the biggest swamp that needs to be drained is located just down the road on Eccles Street.
McHenry Letter to Yellen by zerohedge on Scribd

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Got gold? Congress submits bill to force employers to create a new retirement account for workers since social security is now insolvent

Last week, we wrote here about the fact that the annual Social Security Trustees report showed that the retirement fund had a short fall of $6 trillion dollars, and an overall deficit of $32 trillion.  In essence, this means that Social Security is insolvent and will not be able to pay out benefits to anyone within a few year's time.

So with the fact that Congress had kicked the Social Security can down the road for two decades without doing a thing to fix known deficiencies with the program, and has waited until now when the fund has finally bankrupted itself, what can America's legislative body since we have reached the point where The Stuff has Hit the Fan?

How about create a completely NEW retirement fund from scratch, and make employers pay additional taxes on top of FICA to pay for it.

It was only a few weeks ago that I told you about the government’s annual report on Social Security. 
It was a veritable death sentence for the program. 
The Board of Trustees for Social Security (which includes the US Treasury Secretary) wrote that major parts of the program have already run out of money, and the rest of Social Security will run out of money in the next decade. 
Well, the government has figured out a solution. And it’s genius. 
Two weeks ago a new bill was introduced on the floor of Congress that, just like all the other really dangerous legislation, i.e. USA PATRIOT Act, this bill has a catchy acronym. 
It’s called the SAVE UP Accounts Act, which stands for. . . 
. . . “Secure, Accessible, Valuable, Efficient Universal Pension Accounts Act”. 
In short, SAVE UP mandates certain employers and businesses in the United States, including many small businesses, to start contributing a fixed amount of money per employee into a brand new national retirement fund. 
Based on the contribution requirements and the average wage in the United States (about $50,000 annually), the bill is slapping a 2% wage tax on employers. 
Funny thing, employers are already paying 6.2% to Social Security. 
So an additional 2% tax effectively constitutes a 32% proportional increase. - Sovereign Man
Since employers have already cut many of their worker's hours thanks to Obamacare, and even more over the past six months due to mandatory hikes in minimum wages, what do we think will be the reaction from businesses once this new tax is added to their overhead costs?

And even more, with the nation's largest pension fund (Calpers) admitting to be vastly underfunded, and the largest civilian pension fund (Central States) cutting benefits for all their retirees, isn't it past time that we all took responsibility for our own retirements, and make sure it isn't in paper assets that will be bailed in when the government itself becomes completely insolvent?

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Au contraire Virginia, Congress can evoke bailouts during any financial crisis

In the aftermath of a negative public reaction to the bailing out of banks with taxpayer money following the 2008 Credit Crisis, Congress passed a law in which future crises in the financial system would be settled using the bank’s own customer accounts in what would become known as a bail-in procedure.
Yet on June 13, the possibility of a taxpayer bailout of a financial institution or sovereign government came back to the forefront as the Supreme Court ruled today that the territory of Puerto Rico does not have the authority to default on their debts, and only Congress has the power to legislate bailouts to aid or satisfy the obligations.
BAILOUT
Read more on this article here...

Sunday, April 17, 2016

FDIC study determines most large American banks not ready for next financial crisis

On April 13, the FDIC issued a new report from a study they made regarding the ability of major U.S. banks to deal with a systematic financial collapse.  And in their findings, the FDIC is reporting that 5 of the 8 ‘too big to fail’ banks do not have feasible plans in place to stave off a crisis, and in fact are geared towards the expectation that the government and taxpayers will bail them out once again.
Despite the fact that the 2010 Banking Reform Act specifically placed bond and equity holders as the entities which would bail out a financial institution during the next crisis, major U.S. banks have summarily ignored the new laws and are sure that fear and panic will cause the government to give in and bail them out as they did eight years ago.
taxpayer-big-banks
Read more on this article here...

Thursday, January 7, 2016

Rope a dope: As Obama signs gun control actions, most Americans find government the problem, not guns

In George Orwell’s famous novel 1984, the concept of changing the definition of words to their opposite was the prime way to make people malleable to the will of the government.  Terms such as War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength are just some of the programming done by tyrannical governments to acquire allegiance from people.
In the real world, this type of programming is being done in such measures as President Obama’s new gun control Actions, which throw away all real data and instead make gun ownership an emotional issue, similar to political correctness.  But perhaps in an even bigger diversion, the government is trying to make guns an issue in the eyes of the public when in fact, it is the government itself that is the biggest issue on the minds of Americans.
In a new Gallup Poll out on Jan. 4, the most important problem facing America is not guns, which ranked 19th out of 23 categories, but the government itself, and the inability of government to function correctly and to deal with the problems facing America financially, socially, and geo-politically.

Read more on this article here...

Tuesday, December 22, 2015

Congress passes new spending bill with several hidden riders including CISA

Nothing in politics happens by accident, and if the result was chaos then it was meant to be that way.  These were the words of former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt over 70 years ago, and which apply just as much today as it did back then in the halls of Congress, and the administration of the White House.
This is because a new trillion dollar omnibus spending bill contains much more than just appropriations, as included in the bill are a myriad of liberty destroying laws such as CISA that negate all ground gained in recent years in stopping the government from spying on your communications.
CISA is the Cyber-security Information Sharing Act, and allows private enterprises such as social media and telecommunications to share data with the government without fear of lawsuits, and without warrants.  And like the way the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was pushed through via a defense appropriations bill, Congress provided little time at all for the public, or other legislators, to debate its inclusion in the primary bill.

Read more on this article here...

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Got Karatbars? Social Security again at serious risk from U.S. insolvency as Nov. 2 approaches

In the U.S. there are over 46 million Americans on food stamps alone, and over 100 million who rely upon government benefits to some degree.  And with the U.S. coffers approaching insolvency as soon as Nov. 2, tens of millions of Americans who need their social security checks as their primary source of income stand to lose everything if Congress doesn't vote to increase the national debt limit to just under $20 trillion.

The definition of insolvency is having less revenues or assets than you do debt and liabilities.  And with a national debt of at least $18.1 trillion dollars obligated to debt holders like China, Japan, Russia, and even the Federal Reserve itself, this massive liability is much greater than the total annual GDP for the United States, which came in at $17.48 trillion for the year ending 2014.


Yet why is the current debate over raising the national debt for an insolvent country important?  It is because the promises and mandates the U.S. has to its welfare and social security recipients are being held hostage by the Obama administration, and show that these ponzi schemes cannot function on the taxes withheld from everyone's paycheck each month, and instead require new money in the form of debt just to be able to make these monthly payments.
Appearing on "Fox News Sunday," Lew said that "I don't think there are serious people who think the consequences" of being forced by the debt ceiling to miss a payment on the government's obligations "would be minimal." 
Lew warned that missing any payment could cause economic disruptions, and mentioned one negative effect of a debt ceiling delay that up until now the administration has shied away from, namely the possibility that the government could fail to pay the bills of its most popular entitlement programs. 
"What happens if you don't pay millions of people on Social Security? What happens if you don't pay hospitals and health care providers across the country?" Lew asked. - Washington Examiner
So even with a lawful increase to the national debt, the Secretary of the Treasury has already validated by his own words that the money taken out of our income for Social Security is no longer able to pay recipients their monthly checks, and that there is no 'trust' or lockbox holding the proceeds of decades of SSN payments.


Millennials who are now paying into Social Security over the next 30-40 years of their working life will never see their own benefits when they retire, as nearly all mainstream and alternative economists are in agreement that the system will be completely insolvent within 2 to 10 years.  And in fact, because of the massive increase in recipients due to baby boomers retiring over the next 14 years, very soon there will be less than 2 workers paying taxes towards every SSN recipient.

So if logic and economics proves that this ponzi scheme is bankrupt, and is relegated to the government's needing to print trillions of dollars per year just to pay people's promised checks, what options do you have now to protect yourself from an insolvent government program that won't be there when you need it?

One option to look at is with a company called Karatbars.



Buying gold through Karatbars is one of the easiest things on the net.  In fact, the business model of Karatbars is to sell gold in affordable quantities, such as 1, 2.5, and 5 gram increments, and allow customers to get into the metal without having to shell out $1200+ for a single ounce coin.

And as added perks to signing up with Karatbars, as a customer or affiliate, Karatbars is working on a new e-wallet system that functions just like an offshore bank account, and is outside the authority of the banking system.  From there, you can take your fiat currency in any denomination... dollars, euros, yen, etc... and purchase physical gold which can either be delivered directly to you, or stored for free at one of Karatbar's vaults.

Additionally, any gold that you buy can easily be sold back to Karatbars, or any metals dealer, and if with Karatbars it is then exchanged for currency that is uploaded to you through a pre-loaded debit Mastercard which is connected directly to your e-wallet.  And as we know, MasterCard is recognized in nearly every country around the world, and usable in any currency that accepts it.

But perhaps the best feature with Karatbars is their affiliate program, where you can earn money off commissions from getting others to sign up and become a customer or affiliate.  Not only do you receive commissions from their purchasing of physical gold, but you also earn commissions from anyone who buys a commission package, with that money going directly into your debit MasterCard when you have enough units to cycle.

Imagine the ability to earn the money in which to buy your gold savings simply by purchasing a commission affiliate package one time, and then getting others to sign up and do the same thing.

How many businesses or entrepreneurs can build an infinite business with spending less than $400 of their own money?  And there is never a mandatory requirement to buy beyond what you desire, on your own schedule.  And there is nothing to lose, because you're using money (paper dollars) to buy gold (physical money) and in the end you don't lose a thing.


The global financial system, along with dozens of respected economists, are telling us that now is the time for the end of our current form of money, and the beginning of the transition into a new monetary system that is expected to be backed by gold.  And with banks, governments, and even Harvard professors mandating that central banks have no choice but to eliminate cash from usage by the people to stave off collapse, will you wait until it is too late to make a decision on how you will protect your wealth, and be able to function within the coming new monetary system?

To learn more about Karatbars, you can contact the individual who sent you this article, and click on their referral link to open a free account and begin buying, or building your own gold savings or business with the company of the future.

Monday, October 5, 2015

Fascism is finally here as TPP accords finalized

Fascism is defined as the merging of corporations and state.  And while the United States and its ‘elected’ officials have been tools of the banks and corporations for a long time now, never before has the corporate world been given the power on a silver platter to stand equal to, or above, sovereign governments.
But this ultimate dream for the multinationals is now closer than ever as the closely guarded and secret accords known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) were finalized on Oct. 5, and are just one step away from becoming a treaty as destructive as NAFTA was, and will give private banks and businesses unprecedented power to not only make or dissolve laws, but to bring nations to court in an arena that is determined by the corporations themselves, and not by the people.

Read more on this article here...

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Congress invokes procedural Martial Law in order to force passage of budget

The use of martial law is not limited to simply restrictions placed upon a populace, but it can also be an administrative or procedural ploy implemented by Congress to force the passage of legislation or other laws.  And on Sept. 29. the lower House invoked martial law as a means to break the deadlock to get some form of short-term spending bill passed in lieu of a long term budget.
Congress has gone several years without passing a full annual budget, and instead has passed individual appropriation bills to fund individual portions of the government.  And with the de-funding of Planned Parenthood being the primary catalyst stopping passage of a budget for 2016, severe measures appear to now be in place to get a temporary bill passed to avoid a government shutdown.

Friday, July 31, 2015

Social Security: We’re from the government, and we’re here to destroy what remains of the program

One of the funniest and perhaps saddest commentaries regarding the ability of the Federal government to either fix or run a financial enterprise is that when Uncle Sam co-opts a business platform, the end result is almost always insolvency, or the need for taxpayer bailouts.  In fact, all one has to do is look at the government’s takeover of mortgage and student loan lenders Fannie Mae and Sallie Mae to see that elected officials and their bureaucracies are so incompetent when it comes to finance and running a business, they quite often spend more money keeping these entities afloat than the value of the business was worth.
So when the American people desperately need their government to solve a problem tied to the future of Social Security, Congress’s new planned solution and predictable outcome should come as no surprise.
In a new piece of legislation called the ‘One Social Security Act’ (HR 3150), Congress is seeking to merge two separate entities under the Social Security Administration into one, thus masking the insolvency of both programs and making your retirement insurance now fully integrated with those receiving benefits as a disabled American.

Saturday, June 6, 2015

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: TPP is just one big power grab by corporations

The primary reason that the former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi stated that Congress and the American people would have to wait until the bill (Obamacare) was passed to learn what was in it was because the bill was actually written not by Congress, but by the insurance industry and other corporations tied to healthcare.  And with this and many other precedents in already place, where Congress simply rubber stamps what their campaign contributors tell them to pass as law, it is not surprising that the nefarious Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty that is being written in secret and outside the purview of Congress is according to Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, a major power grab by corporations that would allow them to pretty much mandate most laws in the U.S. going forward.
Sounds alot like what Rothschild once stated… let me control the printing of a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws.
 
 

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Congresswoman submits resolution claiming climate change will drive women to prostitution

Despite the fact that California is experiencing its worst drought in more than a century, there must be something strange in the water to explain why the state continues to elect to Federal office women of limited intelligence.  And when you combine the brain power of officials like Senator Barbara Boxer, Senator Diane Feinstein, and now, Congresswoman Barbara Lee, it is not surprising that businesses are leaving the state in record numbers, and citizens from California are quite often referred to as ‘fruits and nuts’.
So with this foundation being laid down, it should not come as a shock when California Congresswomen Barbara Lee submitted a House Resolution decrying that climate change will be the catalyst for women throughout the state to become prostitutes and hookers.

Read more on this here...

Monday, December 22, 2014

House to vote this afternoon on budget bill that was written in part by… Citibank?

As the House of Representatives prepares to vote this afternoon on a new budget bill to approve appropriations for the next fiscal year, an interesting dichotomy has been revealed in the legislation.  Not only have portions of the bill been written by, and submitted to Congress from banking giant Citigroup, but a rider within the bill is dedicated towards amending the Dodd-Frank banking reform act and will allow derivatives losses by the private banks to be bailout out by…
 
the taxpayers once again.
 
 

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

While Congress waffles, 17 states decide to go to court over Obama’s immigration order

Despite the complete turnover in both Houses of Congress since 2010, the Republican led leadership has become little more than a limp dishrag when it comes to challenging the Constitutionality and legality of Barack Obama’s immigration programs.  But in a move that shows that many states have become extremely fed up with the political shenanigans in Washington, 17 of them signed on for a joint lawsuit condemning Obama’s most recent Executive Proclamation allowing for mass amnesty, and are seeking to have it overturned in the Supreme Court.


Read more on this article here...

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Boehner offering to kick the debt ceiling can down the road for six weeks

As the government shutdown moves into its second week, and the debt ceiling deadline grows ever closer, Congress is offering a new kick the can solution to fund the government for six weeks in an attempt to buy more time to resolve the budget and borrowing issues that have stifled the country.  On Oct. 10, Speaker of the House John Boehner held a press conference to offer a new resolution that would provide clean funding to the government to cover debt obligations through Nov. 22, and to provide more time for the stalemated parties to come to an agreement on several major issues.


Read more on this article here...

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Obama meets with banksters for guidance while telling Congress he won’t negotiate

As the pressures mount on day 3 of the government shutdown, President Obama is proving which masters he truly works for, and on the flip side, which agencies he refuses to answer to.  Just 2 days after going on air to tell the American people that he is willing to call in Congressional leadership to hammer out a solution, the President backtracked after meeting with the heads of Will Street, and is now stating emphatically that he has chosen not to negotiate at all with Congress.
And due to these turn of events, one has to ask then, who is the real power over President Obama?